Subaru Is Building Its Own Finance Arm, Cutting Chase Out by 2030

2027 Subaru Getaway three-row SUV driving on coastal highway at sunset with ocean and cliffs visible in background.
The 2027 Subaru Getaway debuts as the brand's first three-row electric SUV, offering 420 horsepower and seating for up to seven.

For 25 years, Subaru has let Chase run the money side of the business. That changes by 2030.

Subaru Corp and Subaru of America announced Tuesday that Subaru will build its own captive finance operation in the U.S., eventually replacing the Chase arrangement that has powered the Subaru Motors Finance brand since April 2001. The new entity will offer the full suite: retail loans, leases, and floor plan financing for dealers. Target date is 2030.

Chase isn’t walking out the door immediately. Subaru and Chase extended their existing partnership to cover the transition period, which means SMF continues operating under the current structure while Subaru stands up its own infrastructure. Customers with active loans or leases won’t see any disruption, and dealers keep their existing financing relationships intact through the changeover.

The strategic logic is straightforward, even if the timeline is long. Captive finance arms give automakers direct control over rate subsidies, residual values on leases, and the customer data that flows from a financing relationship. When Subaru needs to move metal or protect residual values on a slow-selling configuration, owning the finance company means pulling levers directly rather than negotiating with a third-party bank. Toyota, Honda, Ford, and GM have run captive operations for decades; Subaru has been one of the last volume brands without one.

The timing deserves some scrutiny. Subaru ended 2025 with 643,591 vehicles sold, a 3.6 percent decline from 2024’s 667,725. That’s a meaningful dip for a brand that had been on a sustained upward run. Building a captive finance operation is a multi-year capital commitment that the company is making at a moment when its sales trajectory is pointed in the wrong direction. The counterargument is that owning the finance function gives Subaru more tools to manage the next downturn rather than relying on a bank partner whose risk appetite may not align with Subaru’s volume goals.

Floor plan financing is the piece of this that matters most to dealers. That’s the credit line that funds a dealer’s inventory, and the terms directly affect how aggressively a retailer can stock and discount. Subaru operates through roughly 640 retailers across the United States. Bringing floor plan financing in-house means Subaru can use that lever as part of its retail strategy rather than leaving it on Chase’s balance sheet.

The 2030 target is conservative, which is probably appropriate for a company building this capability from scratch. Standing up underwriting, servicing, compliance infrastructure, and the technology stack that a modern auto finance operation requires is not a two-year project. The extended Chase partnership as a bridge is the sensible hedge: Subaru keeps its financing channel operational and credible to dealers while the new operation gets built, rather than announcing a launch with no backup if the timeline slips.

What Subaru hasn’t said: how the new entity will be capitalized, whether it will carry a new brand name or retain the Subaru Motors Finance identity, and what happens to the Chase relationship if the 2030 date moves. Those are the details that will determine whether this becomes a genuine competitive advantage or a more expensive way to do what Chase has been doing since 2001.

Twenty-five years is a long time to let someone else hold your customer relationships. Subaru is betting the next 25 look different.

Source: Subaru. Images courtesy of Subaru.